It used to be called slavery and many people believe slavery was banished from the earth late in the 19th century, but human trafficking is alive and well not only around the wold but here in America.
It’s existence is unthinkable but when we imagine what modern human trafficking is like we assume it to only affect girls and young women for use as sex slaves, but men and boys are also caught up this despicable but lucrative trade.
Yet, the democrats in the senate would like it to continue.
Sure, leading up to the passage of the Justice for Victims of Human Trafficking Act of 2015, authored by Sen. John Cornyn it looked like smooth sailing with an easy majority of the United States senate, but then the democrats picked up on something they could not abide more, spending limitations.
It’s true.
The Justice for Victims of Human Trafficking Act of 2015 would create a fund, the “Domestic Trafficking Victims’ Fund” that would draw its money from the fines of trafficking crimes. The fund would increase federal resources for trafficking victim support by up to $30 million.
What caused the democrats to cry foul was the clause the restricted the use of the funds. This clause will not allow the funds to be used in the killing of children and we all know how many politicians especially democrats do not want any type of limitations on the killing of children.
Now the word abortion cannot be found Human Trafficking Act.
The language causing a stir says the trafficking victims’ fund “shall be subject to the limitations on the use or expending of amounts described in sections 506 and 507 of division H of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2014…to the same extent as if amounts in the Fund were funds appropriated under division H of such Act.”
That refers to a provision known as the Hyde amendment, which says federal funds can’t be used for abortion except in cases of rape, incest or when the life of the mother is at risk.
That old crocodile, Harry Reid, said Wednesday that putting it in this bill would make the Hyde amendment permanent.
Senator John Cornyn aide Drew Brandewie said that isn’t true, because the Hyde language applies only to the victims’ fund, which the bill authorized only for five fiscal years.
Keep in mind this legislation in no way limits or restricts the actual killing of a child, the only thing is does is keep government money from being used to pay for the destruction of a child. The way it is being reported by most news outlets you would think the language overturns Roe v. Wade itself.
Lawmakers, particularly liberal progressive ones of either party prefer to rally for death rights rather than combat slavery but this is not new for them.
“The potential reach of the measure in this bill gives me very grave concern,” said Sen. Richard Blumenthal (D., Conn.), a co-sponsor of the bill. “Very emphatically, this kind of infringement on women’s health care and fundamental individual rights should not be tolerated in a bill that is designed to preserve and expand those rights.”
You got love that double speak. Blumenthal can twist scripture to sound evil, I’m sure. Note that a restriction on spending of government funds for the execution of children is compared to an infringement on women’s health care and fundamental individual rights. You would think he was a democrat from the deep south talking of slavery and the rights of slave owners with that language.
After all, that was the argument of the godless southern slave owners. Unborn children are similar to slaves of old in that their rights are less than the lives of the women who bear them.
I know this is harsh writing that I use, but the immoral absurdity use by Reid, Blumenthal and their ilk to justify obstruction to an important act that battles human trafficking must be clarified. It was by such absurdity that slavery continued in America as Christian leaders opposed it.
Now the same sort of people use the immorality and depravity of abortion to block the legislation that might limit and reduce the evil of human slavery or the more euphemistic term trafficking. These same type of godless lawmakers were the ones that blocked civil rights laws of the 60s.
They are always there to enslave and oppress the weak in the name of liberty and justice.
